Thomas Hale, the Glover of Newbury, Mass, 1635

Angebote / Angebote:

Excerpt from Thomas Hale, the Glover of Newbury, Mass, 1635: And His Descendants 1. Thomas Hale and his wife Thomasine, or Tamosin, and son Thomas, came to Newbury in 1635, according to both Savage and Coffin. They were probably of the party who first settled in that town in that year, on the banks of the "Quascacunquen, " or Parker River, though his name is not included among those mentioned by Coffin as forming the first colony, "with a few others whose names are not known with certainty." Coffin supposes him to have been the son of William Hale, Esq., of King's Walden, Herts, England, born at that place, May 15, 1606.The birth and baptism of this Thomas apx)ear on the family records at King's Walden, but no further entry is found there touching his life or death. No sufficient proof is found to establish conclusively the identity of Thomas of Newbury with this Thomas of Kings Walden, though facts are known to make such identity probable. The question is still under investigation, and the English origin of Thomas of Newbury may become the subject of a future paper. The date of his arrival in America, the name of the vessel in which he came, and the maiden surname of his wife, are all unknown. Coffin, in his History of Newbury (page 304), describes him as ae. 78 at his death in 1682, while the entries in the same authors Early Settlers of Essex and Old Norfolk (Reg., vol. vi.p. 341), make him ae. 67 in 1677, and . 50 in 1660.Savage says he was freeman 7 Sept.1638 (and see Reg. vol. iii. p.96). But a Thomas Hale was also admitted freeman May 14, 1634(id. p.92), the same day on which Robert Hale of Charlestown was admitted, and the authority on which Savage makes the last named Thomas to refer to Thomas of Roxbury, the brother of Samuel of Glastenbury, does not appear. Tradition in the two families makes Thomas of Newbury and Deacon Robert of Charlestown brothers. If so, Thomas of Newbury was not the son of William of Kings Walden, for the latter had no son Robert. It is probable that Robert and Thomas were related, and it is a noteworthy circumstance that John the son of Robert of Charlestown, and John the son of Thomas of Newbury, married sisters, daughters of Henry Somerby of Newbury. His name first appears in Coffin, under date of August 10, 1638. "Thomas Hale and John Baker are appointed hayward till the town shall appoint new." (p.28.) "February 23 d(1642) a general! towne meeting (of Newbury). By the generall consent of all the freemen the stinting of the commons was referred to Henry Short, Mr. (Edward) Woodman, Edward Rawson, Thomas Hale, and Mr. (John) Woodbridge, according to their best judgments and discretions." (Coffin, pp. 35, 36.) He removed to Haverhill, probably in 1645. In that year he is named as a "landholder" in Haverhill, and "from Newbury." His name heads the list of the first board of selectmen chosen in Haverhill in 1646. In that year his name first appears on the record of assessments in that town. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully, any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.